Post by nurnobi85 on Feb 12, 2024 1:56:16 GMT -5
Andrade and Adriana Franco Giannini Advisor-Rapporteur: Roberto Augusto Castellanos Pfeiffer1 SUMMARY: Concentration Act. Acquisition of Shares. Krone Business. Products and Services Market and Connectivity. Revenue of the Claimants in the national territory below R$ 400,000,000.00. Participation of the Applicants in the relevant national market below 20%. Review of CADE's traditional jurisprudence. The criterion established in art. 54, § 3, of Law 8,884/94 takes into account the annual gross revenue recorded exclusively in Brazilian territory by the companies or group of companies participating in the merger. Non-subsumption to art.
Termination of the process without judgment on the merits. Operation not known. Proposal for editing the summary. VOTE I- OPERATION This involves the acquisition of all shares, by ADC Telecommunications, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “ADC”, of the companies Krone International Holding Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Krone”, and Krone Digital Communications, Inc., hereinafter Dubai Email List referred to as “ Krone Digital” and, together with Krone, “Negócio Krone”, belonging to the Gentek Holding Corporation, Inc. Group, hereinafter referred to as “Gentek legal transaction, without restrictions, given that it does not present itself as harmful or potentially harmful to competition. Additionally, bote evolution .
Understanding regarding the scope of the rule of art. 54, § 3, regarding the billing criterion as a requirement for notification of operations to the Brazilian Competition Defense System. The first vote to specifically address this issue dates back to June 19, 1996, in the judgment of AC 28/95 (Nalco/Exxon Energy Chemicals Brasil Ltda.) reported by former Counselor Rodrigues-Chaves. In this vote, accompanied by the entire CADE Council, the Rapporteur highlighted the principle of territoriality as a criterion for applying the Brazilian antitrust law, with the exception of only conventions and treaties to which Brazil is a signatory, insofar as it represses acts contrary to the economic order practiced in part or all.
Termination of the process without judgment on the merits. Operation not known. Proposal for editing the summary. VOTE I- OPERATION This involves the acquisition of all shares, by ADC Telecommunications, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “ADC”, of the companies Krone International Holding Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Krone”, and Krone Digital Communications, Inc., hereinafter Dubai Email List referred to as “ Krone Digital” and, together with Krone, “Negócio Krone”, belonging to the Gentek Holding Corporation, Inc. Group, hereinafter referred to as “Gentek legal transaction, without restrictions, given that it does not present itself as harmful or potentially harmful to competition. Additionally, bote evolution .
Understanding regarding the scope of the rule of art. 54, § 3, regarding the billing criterion as a requirement for notification of operations to the Brazilian Competition Defense System. The first vote to specifically address this issue dates back to June 19, 1996, in the judgment of AC 28/95 (Nalco/Exxon Energy Chemicals Brasil Ltda.) reported by former Counselor Rodrigues-Chaves. In this vote, accompanied by the entire CADE Council, the Rapporteur highlighted the principle of territoriality as a criterion for applying the Brazilian antitrust law, with the exception of only conventions and treaties to which Brazil is a signatory, insofar as it represses acts contrary to the economic order practiced in part or all.
